What Is Your Reaction?

Please send your thoughts to loisw@hwhpr.com

FASHION

    The Next Met Gala Is Already Controversial

    John Galliano, the designer convicted of a crime after public antisemitic remarks in Paris, will be the focus of the 2027 event. Who will sponsor it?

    Galliano at the 2019 Met Gala.

    Galliano at the 2019 Met Gala. GETTY IMAGES

    By Ashley Wong

    Outcries over the 2026 Met Gala being sponsored by Jeff Bezos and Lauren Sánchez Bezos didn’t stop it from raking in more than $42 million for the Metropolitan Museum of Art’s Costume Institute—a record fundraising haul. 

    The 2027 gala will be headlined by John Galliano, the designer who has been re-embraced by the fashion industry in the years since he was convicted in 2011 for making antisemitic remarks in Paris, where public insults based on religion, race and ethnicity are a crime.

    The Galliano gala and corresponding museum exhibition come at a time when institutions have been willing to revisit characters once considered irredeemable. In announcing his involvement, the Met didn’t name any sponsors of the event, which since 1995 has been chaired by Anna Wintour, the global editorial director at Vogue and a longtime Galliano supporter. Past years’ gala announcements have named sponsors; a representative for the Met said that sponsors for 2027 would be revealed at a later date.

    Galliano and Wintour, who has continued to appear by the designer’s side during his comeback.

    Galliano and Wintour, who has continued to appear by the designer’s side during his comeback. ROSE HARTMAN/ARCHIVE PHOTOS/GETTY IMAGES

    Amy Odell, author of “Anna: The Biography,” characterized the choice of Galliano as perplexing from a fund-raising standpoint. “Are sponsors going to be OK with that?” she asked. 

    Since 2023, the Met Gala has raised over $120 million for the Costume Institute, with support from companies including Louis Vuitton, TikTok, Instagram and Condé Nast, which owns Vogue. 

    Requests for comment from Louis Vuitton, TikTok, Instagram and other past sponsors including Apple and Gucci weren’t immediately returned. A Condé Nast representative, in response to questions including whether the company intends to sponsor next year’s Met Gala, cited a statement that Wintour made last week.

    “There is no one more deserving of an exhibition of this scale than John Galliano,” read the statement, which noted the designer’s professional highs and lows. “The show will take in the full arc of his career and grapple with all of it.” 

    In a separate emailed statement, Jonathan Newhouse, Condé Nast’s board chairman, referenced his longtime backing of Galliano. “I was proud to support him during a difficult period,” Newhouse said. “I hope he continues to create for years to come.”

    The blockbuster fundraiser may become less essential, however. In May, the New York Times reported that the Costume Institute is potentially on track to becoming financially self-sufficient by 2030, and possibly 2028.

    Galliano made his antisemitic remarks while serving as creative director at Dior, where he was promptly fired. He also lost his role at his namesake John Galliano brand. Galliano has said that he was drunk and struggling with substance abuse at the time. He has since gone to rehab, gotten sober and sought counsel from Jewish leaders.

    Galliano with Dior models in 2010.

    Galliano with Dior models in 2010. GETTY IMAGES

    As plans for the 2027 Met Gala came together, Galliano, Wintour and Costume Institute curator Andrew Bolton met with representatives from the Anti-Defamation League and Temple Emanu-El in Manhattan, among others. 

    Rabbi Rick Jacobs, president of the Union for Reform Judaism in North America, attended two meetings, including one with Galliano. He initially had concerns about how the public might react, he said. But his worries were soothed by what he characterized as a sincere desire among Galliano and gala organizers to use the event to demonstrate how people can atone for mistakes. 

    The Jewish leaders pushed for the gala’s corresponding exhibition to prominently acknowledge Galliano’s past behavior. Titled “John Galliano: Horizons,” the exhibit will span his work from 1984 to 2024 and begin with material addressing his antisemitic comments. 

    “Until I met John, until I had those conversations, I wasn’t 100% sure what I would find,” Jacobs said. But he did not believe he was being used as a shield for criticism. “If I didn’t feel that John had done the hard work of earning back his good name and making amends for his horrifying rant, I would have pushed back and not lent my support.”

    Jonathan Greenblatt, the CEO and national director of the Anti-Defamation League, said that his organization accepted Galliano’s apology long ago. “It’s on the Met and partners to meet the moment, not with token gestures around one exhibit,” he added.

    Part of the issue, said Hen Mazzig, a Jewish writer and Israel advocate with more than 700,000 followers across Instagram and X, is that the public was not privy to the meetings. Even if the exhibit takes a nuanced approach, Mazzig added, that care may not translate to the gala itself—a party that derives its power from glamour and a star-studded red carpet where A-listers dress theatrically in outfits that pay homage to the affair’s theme.

    Rihanna in Galliano at the 2018 Met Gala.

    Rihanna in Galliano at the 2018 Met Gala.

    “There is no footnote on a party,” said Mazzig.

    Buzz about a possible Galliano exhibit at the Met had been percolating in the fashion world for years, said Dana Thomas, author of the 2015 biography “Gods and Kings: The Rise and Fall of Alexander McQueen and John Galliano.” Thomas said she didn’t believe the exhibit had widespread public support yet, “and that is what they are going to have to deal with for the next nine months.”

    Interest in Galliano’s Dior designs has recently found a new audience, as younger generations have increasingly sought out Y2K-era vintage fashion. In March, the designer announced a two-year partnership with Zara, the fast-fashion giant owned by the Spanish company Inditex. A representative for Inditex did not respond to requests for comment. 

    Galliano had previously spent a decade as the creative director at Maison Margiela, starting in 2014. His final show for the brand in 2024 received widespread glowing reviews. Throughout Galliano’s comeback, Wintour has continued to appear by his side.

    The year he started at Margiela, Galliano presented a British Fashion Award to Wintour, who accepted it wearing one of his designs for the brand. In January, the two sat next to each other in the front row at a Dior fashion show in Paris. In a 2023 documentary about Galliano, Wintour said she didn’t worry about how their friendship might affect her reputation. “I just wanted to help him,” Wintour says in the film.   

    Odell, the Wintour biographer, said the announcement of Galliano’s Met retrospective reminded her of something that André Leon Talley, Vogue’s longtime editor at large who died in 2022, told the author when she asked him what Wintour’s greatest strength was. 

    “Talley said, ‘She can turn a no into a yes,’ ” Odell said.

    July In Miami, Busy, Busy

    Congratulations to Fountainhead Arts for creating the FH Forum, a group of 12 women who make it possible for artists to secure their work in museums around the world. Pictured here is FH alum Sarah Zapata’s (red bow) with her solo exhibition at The Bass Museum. I also got to meet Bass’s curator Jasa McKenzie (upper right corner) Many thanks to Fountainhead’s Forum for this exciting adventure.

    ❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️

    What took me so long?

    ❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️

    Click on link to find out why truly rich folks feel branded designer clothes make you look poor.

    https://youtube.com/shorts/ODThd6Z_Lu4?is=NYDLlhlAVRvCOO7S

    What Do You Think?

    DigiDame Discoveries

    I always like to share news breaking stories.

    Mark Zuckerberg Blasts Centralization of A.I. Power

    A.I. software could lead to a centralization of power that would narrow people’s access to the transformational technology.

    Mark Zuckerberg Blasts Centralization of A.I. Power

    A.I. software could lead to a centralization of power that would narrow people’s access to the transformational technology.

    Zuckerberg Blasts Centralization of A.I. Power

    A.I. software could lead to a centralization of power that would narrow people’s access to the transformational technology.

    https://lnkd.in/etqivAfM

    ❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️

    ❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️

    ❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️
    One of my favorite artists

    ❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️

    Someone I know Sends Me These Helpful Hints

    ❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️

    ❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️

    Special Moments

    ❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️

    This is the sculpture Eliot and I sponsored for two years at the Parrish Museum in Water Mill, a town in the Hamptons.

    Artist Randi Renate

    American, born 1991

    The sculpture is called “Are we psychic coral-polyps?” Created in 2022 cedar, casein paint, steel

    The sign says, “Are we psychic coral-polyps? 2022 at the Parrish is made possible thanks to the generous support of Lois Whitman-Hess and Eliot Hess.

    Randi Renate

    ❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️

    ❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️

    Judge Robert W. Williams, Jr. celebrates 103 remarkable years

    I don’t remember many of my friends with such an accomplished father.  Outstanding

    Judge Robert W. Williams, Jr. celebrates 103 remarkable years


    Robert W. “Bobby” Williams III, Gail P. Williams, and Barry C. Williams

    https://www.phillytrib.com/lifestyle/out_and_about/judge-robert-w-williams-jr-celebrates-103-remarkable-years/article_39069d2b-0d5a-4fb0-92f7-b42f4cbd114e.html?utm_medium=social&utm_source=email&utm_campaign=user-share

    The Washington Post Sent This To Me

    DigiDame Discoveries

    I just had to share. Too good to keep to myself.


    https://www.consumerbags.com/coolest-gifts?gclid=EAIaIQobChMIofeCo8_elQMVL4TLAR1m4h8vEAEYASAAEgIYzfD_BwE&campaignid=22972773274&adgroupid=184272458346&loc_physicall_ms=1015116&loc_interest_ms=&matchtype=&network=d&creative=792660244304&keyword=&placement=www.washingtonpost.com&targetid=&cpid=c33d7a4c-90a2-49fe-97b4-f5b1cb84f215&lpid=47a7394d-7a0d-461f-ad37-915e64860d7f&gbraid=0AAAAAp6-wf7saZQ1rHRsUAW26phejjGrP&gad_source=5&gad_campaignid=22972773274

    The Romantic And Explosive Stories Behind Art’s Greatest Couples

    DigiDame Discoveries

    I never thought so many other couples have the same challenges and responses as us. We don’t meet many other couples who are around each other 24/7, 365. Those that do understand how much deeper our love is for each other than those who constantly profess their love on social media, or show off holding hands for everyone to see when they go for a walk.

    Deep love is battling it out, making demands, sharing all the good times together, common goals, and keeping each other secure, healthy and happy. I’ll leave interpreting the bedroom rituals up to the individuals.

    I found analyzing the couples who are in the art world together very eye opening. Just like Kate Bryan states in her introduction, “artists are special.” Reading about them was an extra bonus for me because we have so much in common.

    Bryan has always believed that artists are special. It is rare that a person commits themselves to a life of pure creative expression, governed only by their artistic impulses and motivated by the compulsion to create. It can often make for insecurities or, conversely, large egos as well as a fusion of work and life that is atypical to most people. An artist does not just make artwork; in many respects they are their artwork. As such, it is especially unusual and intriguing when two artists come together in a romantic relationship – often resulting in the doubling of egos, insecurities and passion.

    I have always found the subject intriguing, particularly when two artists who are involved or married collaborate on their artwork. One cannot help but wonder if they ever get a moment off. How can they build a side door into a robust creative landscape that they share and cultivate?

    The longevity of the romantically linked artistic duo is also extremely vulnerable – what happens when love fades and two artists remain joined under a moniker but no longer by the heart? For artists in a relationship who work independently, there is a myriad of issues to navigate: how to manage jealousy and competition; how to share in your partner’s work without compromising your own; whether to promote your spouse to your collectors and gallerists. And if you should both become successful in your lifetime, which as The Art of Love demonstrates is exceptionally rare, how do you protect your relationship and art from the spotlight of personal enquiries?

    Want more? Read the book and call me to attend the Oolite book club at my place where we will be discussing all elements of the chapters we read. The book was strongly suggested by Marie Elena Angulo, Chair of the Oolite’s Board.. Thank you MEA.

    Tuesday, July 28th, 6:30 – 8:30 PM. RSVP by Monday, July 27th. You will be provided with the address at the time of enrollment.

    Again, thank ooh you!

    Lois

    Hear All About It On Art Lovers Forum Podcast

    Michael J. Freeman, Ph.D.

    I’m all jazzed up about my new assignment.

    For decades, one of the most important missing links in the history of artificial intelligence has been sitting quietly in storage. It’s soon going to be owned by a major institution. How do I know? I’m in charge of the project. I’m just starting my search. My client is Michael J. Freeman, Ph.D., an American inventor, who is widely recognized across the technology, science, toy, and education industries. 

     

    We have worked together over the last few decades. The biggest bonanza was when we secured a major spread about Michael’s ACTV invention in Business Week. Thank you writer Otis Port.

     

    Long before today’s AI revolution, American inventor Freeman created a groundbreaking educational robot named Leachim (an anagram of Michael) — a six-foot-tall computerized teaching machine that astonished students, educators, scientists, and the media in the early 1970s.

     

    Now, after years hidden away while Freeman’s career expanded into interactive television, educational toys, telecommunications systems, and advanced behavioral technologies, Leachim has finally emerged from the closet once again — not as a forgotten curiosity, but as a major technological achievement deserving preservation by a major institution.

     

    Decades before Siri, Alexa, ChatGPT, or adaptive learning systems, Leachim was already demonstrating many of the foundational concepts associated with modern artificial intelligence. Developed in 1974 and tested in a Bronx public school classroom, the robot contained encyclopedic and curricular information, verbally addressed students by name, adjusted its teaching speed to individual learning needs, remembered personal interests and hobbies, and demonstrated what students described as “infinite patience.”

     

    Children adored the experience. Some openly admitted they preferred learning from Leachim over learning from human teachers because the robot never embarrassed them, never became frustrated, and encouraged them to keep trying until they succeeded.

     

    Leachim was not science fiction. It was a functioning educational AI robot decades ahead of its time.

     

    The robot quickly became a national media sensation, appearing on television programs including The Phil Donahue Show, where audiences struggled to believe there was not a hidden operator inside the machine. There wasn’t.

     

    Freeman would later create or influence technologies and products that became part of everyday American life, including the hugely successful 2-XL smart toy, interactive cable television systems through ACTV Inc., and numerous educational robotics concepts later licensed by major toy manufacturers including Fisher-Price, Hasbro, CBS Toys, and View-Master Ideal.

     

    Yet Leachim remains the origin point — the prototype that helped define an entirely new relationship between humans and machines.

     

    Its historical importance extends beyond robotics. Leachim represents a rare convergence of American invention, education, psychology, speech synthesis, behavioral learning systems, and early human-computer interaction. It anticipated today’s debates about personalized learning, emotional connection to machines, adaptive instruction, and AI-assisted education by more than half a century.

     

    The story surrounding the robot is equally extraordinary.

     

    In 1975, after a television appearance in Chicago, Leachim was reportedly stolen while being transported back to New York. Lloyd’s of London offered a reward based on the robot’s insured value, and suspicions of corporate espionage circulated widely at the time — further cementing Leachim’s legendary status in early technology history.

     

    Now, after being carefully preserved for years while Freeman pursued other ventures and innovations, Leachim is being reintroduced to the public alongside original prototypes, patents, inventor notes, educational materials, and commercial descendants that trace the evolution of interactive learning technology from the 1970s to today’s AI era.

     

    This is more than a robot.

     

    It is a missing chapter in the story of artificial intelligence.

     

    At a moment when society is urgently trying to understand where AI came from — and where it may lead us — Leachim offers museums and cultural institutions a rare opportunity to showcase the astonishing foresight of an American inventor whose ideas arrived generations before the world was ready for them.

     

    You can reach me at: loisw@hwhpr.com

     

    Listen to episode 60 of the Art Lovers Forum podcast here – https://www.artloversforum.com/e/the-title-of-episode_60_-_michael_freeman/

     

     

    The Art Lovers Forum Podcast is also available on popular podcast sites, including:

     

    Apple Podcasts – https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/art-lovers-forum-podcast/id1725034621

    Spotify – https://open.spotify.com/show/5FkkeWv83Hs4ADm13ctTZi

    Amazon Music – https://music.amazon.com/podcasts/77484212-60c5-4026-a96f-bd2d4ae955c6

    Audible – https://www.audible.com/pd/Art-Lovers-Forum-Podcast-Podcast/B0CRR1XYLZ

    iHeartRadio – https://www.iheart.com/podcast/1323-art-lovers-forum-podcast-141592278/